πalling to all ππ‘ππ¬π£ππ‘, π‘ππ§, π¦π§π₯ππ¬ ππππ¦, π§ππ ππ’π¬π & π§π₯πππ¦π¨π₯π rp-ers to join with us ππ° the 2π§π πeneration. πake sure youβve done the π ‘π €π π π ’ so you can send the π π π ‘π π π £here.
πalling to all ππ‘ππ¬π£ππ‘, π‘ππ§, π¦π§π₯ππ¬ ππππ¦, π§ππ ππ’π¬π & π§π₯πππ¦π¨π₯π rp-ers to join with us ππ° the 2π§π πeneration. πake sure youβve done the π ‘π €π π π ’ so you can send the π π π ‘π π π £here.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
ππ π πππππππ πππ from no
